Tag Archives: accounting for small business

Home / Posts tagged "accounting for small business" ()

Super “Opt Out” Choice For High Earners

If you’re a high income-earner with multiple employers, you may be aware of potential traps with compulsory super contributions that can lead to some hefty and unfair penalty taxes – and until now there’s been little anyone can do to avoid the problem. Fortunately, proposed new laws will give high income-earners the opportunity to take proactive steps to overcome any penalties.

 

Are you a medical professional or company director hired by multiple organisations who make compulsory super guarantee (SG) contributions on your behalf? Or perhaps you’re simply a high-income professional with an extra employment arrangement on the side, like a university teaching gig or consulting arrangement? If you have more than one “employer” for super purposes, you may benefit from changes to how the SG is administered for high income-earners.

 

What’s the issue?

A person’s concessional contributions (CCs) are capped at $25,000 per annum and include:

compulsory SG contributions
any additional salary-sacrifice amounts
any personal contributions made by the member for which they claim a deduction.

 

Unfortunately, a problem arises when an individual has multiple employers and inadvertently breaches their $25,000 CC cap because they receive compulsory contributions from each of these employers.

 

While an employer is only required to make compulsory contributions of 9.5% on the worker’s earnings up to $55,270 per quarter (or $221,080 per financial year), this applies on a per employerbasis. An employer must make contributions up to these thresholds regardless of how many other compulsory contributions the employee receives from other employers.

 

Example: Susan, a doctor, earns $215,000 p.a. from employer A, and $85,000 p.a. from employer B. Both employers must make contributions of 9.5% on all of Susan’s earnings because both salaries are below the $221,080 p.a. ceiling. This means Susan has total CCs of $28,500 ($20,425 + $8,075), and has breached her $25,000 CC cap.

 

If you contribute above the $25,000 cap, you will personally incur penalty tax on the excess amount at your marginal tax rate less a 15% offset, plus interest charges.

 

New opportunity to “opt out”

Fortunately, under proposed new laws before Parliament, affected employees will be able to “opt out” of receiving compulsory contributions from a particular employer by obtaining a certificate from the Commissioner of Taxation. The certificate will name a particular employer and a particular quarter of the financial year, and will exempt that employer from having to make SG contributions.

 

This is welcome news for high income-earners who may be at risk of breaching their CC cap. Here are some key requirements to know:

-You’ll need to apply for a certificate at least 60 days before the beginning of the relevant quarter.
-The Commissioner will only be able to issue you a certificate if you’re likely to have excess CCs if the certificate is not issued. To make this assessment, the Commissioner can rely on evidence such as past tax return data, employer payroll data and information provided in your application.
-You’ll be able to apply for certificates for multiple employers. However, you must always have at least one employer who’s required to make SG contributions for you.
-Once issued, a certificate cannot be varied or revoked.

 

If you choose to take advantage of this opt-out, you’ll be able to negotiate with the exempted employer to receive additional remuneration in lieu of super contributions (and you won’t need to show evidence of this to the Commissioner). The employer will still be allowed to make SG contributions (eg if negotiations for additional salary fail), but having the certificate in place means the employer will not be penalised if they don’t make contributions.

 

Start planning now

The legislation to enable the opt-out is likely to pass this year, creating some opportunities for 2020 planning. If you’re receiving SG contributions from multiple sources, contact us to begin your remuneration planning and to explore whether the opt-out may benefit you.

Top 10 Rules For The CGT Replacement Asset Rollover

When you suffer the loss or destruction of assets through natural disasters or through compulsory acquisition, you most likely will be in a position to receive money or another asset (or both) as compensation. You are also left with a choice to either defer any capital gains liability (CGT) or receive an exemption. We look at the top 10 rules for when this occurs.

 

Urban growth often triggers a correlative expansion of our road networks and related civil works. To accommodate these you might find yourself losing your home or a portion or all of your land through its compulsory acquisition by a government agency. Similarly, natural disasters in the guise of hurricanes, floods and fires can lead to wide-scale destruction of property and personal assets.

 

In both situations you could receive money or another CGT asset (or both) as compensation, leaving you with a choice to:

-defer your liability to pay tax on any capital gain arising on the disposal (ie, rollover); or

-receive a CGT exemption for any replacement asset if you acquired the original asset before 20 September 1985.

If the asset is property and it qualifies as your main residence, then you can ignore any capital gain or loss that results from the compulsory acquisition.

 

Qualifying for CGT rollover can bring a number of tax benefits for small business and individuals, but navigating the intricacies of CGT exemptions and rollover rules can take some work. To help we have compiled a list of the top 10 rules for application of the rollover, but please get in touch with us for advice tailored to your individual circumstances.

 

Top 10 rollover rules
1. The rollover only applies if the taxpayer has made a capital gain on the compulsory acquisition of a post-CGT asset (or its loss or destruction).

 

2. The rollover applies if either money (ie, compensation), or a replacement asset is received for the compulsory acquisition (or its loss or destruction).

 

3. If money is received the taxpayer must incur expenditure in acquiring a “replacement” asset and the expenditure must begin to be incurred no later than one year after the income year in which the compulsory acquisition occurs – being the income year in which the contract for compulsory acquisition is entered into (or within such further time as the Commissioner allows).

 

4. Basic requirements for a replacement asset are:

it cannot be a depreciating asset;
if the compulsorily acquired asset was used, or installed ready for use, in the taxpayer’s business, the replacement asset must also be used for a “reasonable time” after the taxpayer acquires it
if the compulsorily acquired asset was not used, or installed ready for use, in the taxpayer’s business, the taxpayer must use the replacement asset for the “same” or a “similar” purpose as the compulsorily acquired asset immediately before its acquisition – and for a reasonable time after acquiring it.

 

5. If the compulsorily acquired asset was a pre-CGT asset, the replacement asset will also be deemed to be pre-CGT status provided:

the taxpayer does not expend more than 120% of the market value of the original asset (immediately before its disposal) in acquiring a replacement asset or;
if the asset was destroyed by natural disaster, it is reasonable to treat the replacement asset as “substantially the same” as the original asset.

 

6. Despite the application of the rollover, an immediate CGT liability will arise if the compensation received exceeds the expenditure on the replacement asset. The amount of the capital gain in this case will depend on the following:

If the capital gain that would otherwise have arisen from the compulsory acquisition is greater than the “excess” of the compensation over the expenditure incurred on a replacement asset, then a capital gain will arise equal to that “excess”. See Example 1 below.

 

Example 1

John owns an asset that has a cost base of $10,000. The asset is destroyed and he receives $40,000 in compensation. John spends $24,000 in replacing the asset. There will be a “notional” capital gain of $30,000 (ie, $40,000 compensation less $10,000 cost base). This notional capital gain of $30,000 is greater than the “excess” of $16,000 (ie, $40,000 less $24,000). Therefore, John will realise a capital gain of, $16,000, which is the amount of the “excess”. In calculating any future capital gain or loss on the replacement asset, the cost base expenditure incurred on the replacement asset (ie, $24,000) is reduced by the amount by which the notional gain (ie, $30,000) is more than the “excess”(ie, $16,000); so $24,000 is reduced by $14,000 ($30,000 less $16,000), leaving cost base expenditure for the replacement asset of $10,000.

 

If the capital gain that would have arisen from the compulsory acquisition is less than or equal to the “excess” of the compensation received over expenditure on a replacement asset, then the capital gain is not reduced. See Example 2 below.

 

Example 2

Jenny receives $4,000 compensation for damage to an asset. The cost base of the asset is $1,600. Jenny expends $1,000 repairing it. There will be a notional capital gain of $2,400 (ie $4,000 less $1600) and the “excess” will be $3,000 (ie $4,000 less $1,000). As the notional capital gain of $2,400 is less than the “excess” (ie $3,000), the notional capital gain is not reduced and is taxed as the actual capital gain. Therefore, Jenny would have an actual capital gain of $2,400.

7. If the compensation received does not exceed the expenditure incurred on the replacement asset, then no capital gain arises – but the cost base expenditure incurred on the replacement asset or repair is reduced by the amount of the capital gain that would otherwise have arisen but for the rollover.

 

8. If the taxpayer receives a replacement asset instead of money, any capital gain made on the original asset is disregarded. If the original asset was post-CGT, the taxpayer is taken to have acquired the replacement asset for an amount equal to the cost base of the original asset. If the original asset was pre-CGT, the replacement asset is also taken to be pre-CGT.

 

9. If both money and a replacement asset are received each part of the compensation is treated separately, in accordance with the rules for the receipt of money or the receipt of an asset.

 

10. If the compulsorily acquired asset was an “active asset” (ie, used in a business) then the taxpayer would also qualify for the CGT Small Business Concession (SBC) and could choose to apply them instead (with better tax outcomes). This would include the CGT small business rollover. Note, that the advantages in applying the CGT SBC is that the replacement asset does not have to be acquired until two years after the relevant income year and it can be a depreciating asset.

 

If you need help to understand the rules listed above, please talk to us.

Capital Gains Tax And Death: It’s Not The End Of The World

There’s nothing as certain as death and taxes, but tax on death is not so clear. The good news is that when an asset passes to a beneficiary, capital gains tax (CGT) generally does not apply. But down the track when the beneficiary decides to sell that asset, there are many forks in the path.

 

There is enough pain and anguish when someone dies, so fortunately there is, in most cases at least, no duty on assets that form part of the deceased’s estate and are passed to a beneficiary, or their legal personal representative (LPR). But as with life, the rules regarding death and CGT are not meant to be easy, particularly when that asset is a “dwelling”.

This article will explore the CGT consequences for the deceased estate and the beneficiary of:

-the transmission on death, of an asset, specifically a dwelling

-the subsequent sale of that dwelling.

 

CGT on the inheritance of a dwelling

Generally, the law says that there is no CGT liability for the deceased on the transmission of an asset to a beneficiary.

 

The beneficiary is considered to be the new owner of the inherited asset on the day the deceased person died and CGT does not apply to that asset.

 

This applies to all assets, including a dwelling.

The exception is where the beneficiary is a “tax advantaged entity” (TAE), such as a charity, foreign resident or complying superannuation entity. In this case the deceased estate (not the TAE) is liable for any capital gain or loss attached to the asset. This will need to be taken into account in the deceased’s final tax return in the year in which he or she died.

 

CGT on the sale of an inherited dwelling

If the beneficiary subsequently sells the bequeathed asset, this may create a CGT “event”, depending on the status of the property, when it was purchased, when the deceased died and whether the sale qualifies for the CGT “main residence” exemption.

 

CGT liability on the sale will be determined by whether:

-the deceased died before, on or after 20 September 1985 (when CGT was introduced); and

-the dwelling was acquired before, on or after 20 September 1985; and if acquired post-CGT, whether the deceased died before, on or after 20 August 1996.

 

The following table identifies when CGT applies to the sale of an inherited dwelling and the relevant cost base. It refers to these two conditions:

 

Condition 1: Dwelling was sold (note that this means settlement must have occurred) within two years of the person’s death. This exemption applies regardless of whether the beneficiary used the dwelling as their main residence or produced income from it during this period. The two-year period can be extended at the Commissioner’s discretion. New safe harbour rules allow executors and beneficiaries to self-assess this discretion provided a number of conditions are met.

 

Condition 2: From the deceased’s death until the sale, the dwelling was not used to produce income, and was the main residence of one or more of the following:

-the deceased’s spouse;

-an individual who had a right to occupy it under the deceased’s will; or

-the beneficiary.
 

CGT on the sale of an inherited dwelling

Dwelling acquired by deceased (D)                  Date of death                         Subsequent disposal by beneficiary (B)
Pre-CGT (ie before 20 September 1985)                      Pre-CGT                                                    No CGT

Exception: dwelling subject to major capital improvements post-CGT  and used to produce assessable income

 

 

Pre-CGT                                                                            Post-CGT                             No CGT if: Condition 1 or 2 is satisfied
If CGT applies, B’s cost base is the dwelling’s cost base in D’s hands at the date of death

 

 

 

Post-CGT                                                                  Before 20 August 1996                    No CGT if:

 

Condition 2 is satisfied; and D always used dwelling as main residence (MR) and did not use it to produce assessable income

If CGT applies, B’s cost base is the cost base of the dwelling in D’s hands at the date of death

 

On or after                                No CGT if:

21 August 1996

 

Condition 1 or 2 is satisfied; and just before D died dwelling was used as MR and was  not being used to produce assessable income

 

If CGT applies, B’s cost base is the market value of the dwelling at the date of  death

 

In calculating the CGT, the beneficiary or the LPR cannot use any of the deceased’s unapplied net capital losses against the net capital gains.

 

Guidance at hand

If you have inherited a dwelling and are in the dark about the CGT impact of hanging onto it or selling it, we can guide you through the minefield and minimise any tax consequences.

Employees Benefit From New Insolvency Decision

Do you know if the company you work for is a corporate trustee of a trust or a company trading in its own right? Many employees wouldn’t have a clue and until recently, if you were an employee of a corporate trustee and it became insolvent, your claim for employee entitlements wouldn’t have any more weight than all the other unsecured creditors calling for their piece of the liquidated pie. A series of court cases, most recently a decision by the Federal Court, has now changed that in your favour.

 

If you worked for a company and it goes bust, the law gives you priority to be paid your entitlements including wages and superannuation. There is what’s called a priority regime that applies when a company becomes insolvent.

 

Until recently, the priority status enjoyed by employees of a company trading in its own right did not apply to employees of a corporate trustee when it became insolvent. In the latter case, employees would have the same priority as, and have to compete for payment with, the unsecured creditors.

 

Courts say priority regime applies to trusts

A landmark court case in the Full Federal Court has recently decided that employees of an insolvent corporate trading trust should be paid their entitlements subject to the same order of priorities that applied to employees of an insolvent company.

 

This confirms the decision of a Victorian case, decided on appeal earlier this year. In the Victorian trial case, before the decision was successfully appealed, the judge held that the priority regime didn’t apply to trust assets and therefore employees of an insolvent corporate trustee should be denied the priority payment of their unpaid entitlements. This decision would leave the employees on equal pegging with the other unsecured trust creditors, instead of receiving preferential treatment for their employee entitlements.

 

The appeal decision recognises that employees need a leg up the creditors’ ladder when a company goes under and they should not be disadvantaged by working for a company that operates through a trust rather than for a company trading in its own right.

 

There have been many conflicting court cases over the years in this area of employee entitlements in the event of insolvency.

This uncertainty has for now been resolved by the Federal Court, confirming the decision in the Victorian appeal court that there is a level playing field for employees: whether they work for a corporate trustee of a trust or a company trading in its own right, they are entitled to the same priority of payment.

 

Help in a complex area

If you work for a business that’s becoming or is insolvent, and you need help to get your fair share of the proceeds, we can provide the experienced advice you need.

Valuing Your SMSF’s Assets: Know The Requirements

Recording the market value of your SMSF’s assets is an important trustee responsibility. But how do you prove “market value”, how often must you value assets and when do you need to hire an expert valuer? Fortunately, with some help from the ATO’s guidelines and your professional adviser, asset valuation needn’t be a headache for trustees.

 

To keep your SMSF’s auditor and the ATO happy, it’s essential to take asset valuation seriously. By law, SMSFs must record all of their assets at “market value” – an important requirement that allows funds to accurately report the value of members’ benefits. Additionally, there are a number of SMSF investment rules that specifically require a “market value” to be assessed, so failing to correctly value assets could land SMSF trustees in hot water.

 

For example, SMSFs are generally prohibited from acquiring assets from related parties – with some notable exceptions such as “business real property” (broadly, 100% commercial property) and listed shares. However, these exceptions only apply if the assets in question are acquired at market value. Knowing the market value of fund assets is also essential to complying with the in-house asset rules and certain laws covering the sale of collectables and personal use assets.

 

What is market value?

Under superannuation law, “market value” is defined as the amount that a willing buyer would reasonably be expected to pay in a hypothetical scenario where all of the following conditions are met:

-the buyer and seller deal with each other at arm’s length;
-the sale occurs after proper marketing of the asset; and
-the buyer and the seller act “knowledgeably and prudentially”.

 

How does this work in practice? In an audit, your SMSF’s auditor (and ultimately the ATO) will expect you to be able to provide evidence supporting your valuation. This should be based on “objective and supportable” data, and should demonstrate a “fair and reasonable” valuation method.

 

The ATO says a method is fair and reasonable if it is a good faith, rational process that takes into account all relevant factors and can be explained to a third party.

 

In general, it’s not compulsory to use a qualified external valuer (that is, someone who holds formal valuation qualifications or has specific skills or experience in valuing certain assets). It’s the methodology and supporting evidence that makes a valuation sound, not the identity of the person who performs the valuation. However, there are some situations where using a qualified valuer is compulsory or recommended:

 

-If your SMSF holds collectables or personal use assets (eg artwork), you must by law use a valuation from a qualified independent valuer before disposing of such assets to related parties.

-The ATO also recommends that you consider using a qualified independent valuer for any asset that represents a large proportion of your fund’s total value, or if the valuation is likely to be complex or difficult given the nature of the asset.

 

Specific assets

As noted above there are specific requirements for collectables, and the ATO has also developed guidelines for other classes of assets.

The ATO says real estate doesn’t need to be valued each year, unless there has been a significant event since the last valuation that may affect the value. This could include market volatility or changes to the property.

Listed shares and managed units are easy to value, and should therefore be valued at the end of each financial year. Unlisted shares and units (eg investments in private companies or trusts) are more difficult to value than listed assets and require consideration of a range of factors. Trustees should seek professional assistance with valuing unlisted investments.

 

Need help getting it right?

For some assets, determining market value can be a complex process that requires professional input. Don’t go it alone – get the right advice and ensure your valuations stand up to ATO scrutiny. Contact our office to discuss the ATO guidelines in more detail or to begin assessing your SMSF’s valuation needs.

Moving Overseas? Three Options For Your SMSF

Taking an extended job posting overseas? If you currently have an SMSF, you’ll need a strategy for managing your super to ensure your fund doesn’t breach any residency rules. Know your options and plan before you go.

 

When SMSF trustees travel overseas for an extended period, there’s a risk their fund’s “central management and control” (CMC) will be considered to move outside Australia. This causes the SMSF to become non-resident, resulting in very hefty penalty taxes. It’s essential to plan for this before departing overseas.

 

The first step is to consider whether your absence will be significant enough to create a CMC risk. A temporaryabsence not exceeding two years isn’t a problem, but whether the ATO considers your absence temporary or permanent will depend on your particular case. Your adviser can take you through the ATO’s guidelines. If you think you’ll have a CMC problem, the next step is to consider possible solutions.

 

Option 1: Appoint an attorney

Usually, every SMSF member must be a trustee (or director of its corporate trustee). However, an SMSF member travelling overseas can avoid CMC problems by appointing a trusted Australian-based person to act as trustee (or director) for them, provided that person holds the member’s enduring power of attorney (EPOA).

 

Sounds simple? Just a word of caution: the SMSF member must resign as a trustee (or director) and be prepared to genuinely hand over control to their attorney.

 

If the member continues to effectively act like a trustee while overseas – for example, by sending significant instructions to their attorney or being involved in strategic decision-making – there’s a risk the CMC of the fund may really be outside Australia.

 

You’ll also need to comply with the separate “active member” test, which broadly requires that while the SMSF is receiving any contributions, at least 50% of the fund’s total asset value attributable to actively contributing members is attributable to resident contributing members. To illustrate this, in a Mum-and-Dad SMSF where both spouses are overseas, a single contribution from either spouse could cause the fund to fail this test and expose the fund to penalties. In other words, you may need to stop SMSF contributions entirely while overseas. Consider making any contributions into a separate public offer fund.

 

Option 2: Wind up

Not prepared to give control of your super to an acquaintance? You might consider rolling your super over to a public offer fund and winding up the SMSF. This option completely removes any CMC stress (as control lies with the professional Australian trustee), and you can make contributions into the large fund without worrying about the “active member” test.

However, you’ll need to sell or transfer out the SMSF’s assets first – real estate, shares and other investments – and this may trigger capital gains tax (CGT) liabilities. These asset disposals will be partly or even fully exempt from CGT if the fund is paying retirement phase pensions, so talk to your adviser about your SMSF’s expected CGT bill if you choose this wind-up option.

 

Option 3: Convert to a small APRA fund

Another option is converting the SMSF into a “small APRA fund” (SAF). Like SMSFs, SAFs have a maximum of four members but instead of being managed by the members they are run by a professional licensed trustee. This takes care of any CMC worries, and on conversion the fund won’t incur any CGT liabilities because the assets remain in the fund – only the trustee structure changes.

The downside is that an SAF may be expensive because you’ll be paying a professional trustee to run your fund. You’ll also need to comply with the “active member test” so, as in Option 1, you may need to stop all contributions into the SAF.

 

Let’s talk

If you’re moving overseas for a while, contact us to start your SMSF planning now. We can help you explore your options and implement a strategy to protect your superannuation against residency problems.

Tax Time 2019: Your Payment Summary Is Changing

Ready for tax time 2019? This year there’ll be some changes to how many employees access their tax information from their employer. The good news is this is part of a big switch to electronic reporting that will eventually make tax time easier. But as with all new systems, there are some new details to get your head around.

 

If you’re an employee, there are a few things you need to know this tax time about the ATO’s new “Single Touch Payroll” (STP) system. This system requires employers to report information like salaries, wages, allowances, PAYG withholding and superannuation contributions to the ATO electronically every time they pay their employees.

 

You’ve probably still been receiving payslips each cycle, but at tax time you’ll generally no longer receive a payment summary (sometimes known as a “group certificate”) from your employer.

 

Instead, you’ll be able to access a summary through the ATO’s online services. This will now be known as an “income statement”.

Because STP is new, we’re still in a transitional period. Here’s what you need to know:

-For businesses with 20 or more employees, STP became compulsory last year on 1 July 2018.

-For businesses with under 20 employees, STP applies from 1 July 2019, but these businesses still have a few months to get their systems working.

This means that for tax time 2019, some employers will still give their staff a payment summary while others will not because their reporting has already shifted online to the ATO. And if you have two employers, it’s possible you might receive a payment summary from one this year but not from the other.

 

How does it all work online?

Taxpayers with STP-compliant employers will access their new income statements through the “myGov” online portal. This is a central government portal where you can also access services like Centrelink, Medicare and others. To use this online service to view your income statement, you first need to have a myGov account, and then link your account up to ATO services.

 

Once your employer is using STP and your myGov account is linked to the ATO, you can access your information as follows:

-Throughout the income year, you can log on to check your year-to-date income, tax and superannuation information at any time. Each time your employer pays you, this data will be updated (although it may take a few days for updated amounts to appear).

-After the end of the income year, the ATO will send a message to your myGov inbox to let you know your annual income statement is finalised and ready.

 

If you log on in July to access your income statement, you should wait until your employer has marked your statement as “tax ready” before you lodge your tax return. Employers have until 31 July to do this. The data from your income statement will be pre-filled into the “myTax” online tax return system even if your income statement isn’t “tax ready” yet, so be careful when lodging.

 

It’s not compulsory to have a myGov account and you don’t need one to lodge your tax return. Your tax agent can access your income statement for you. However, not having a myGov account means you can’t check your information online yourself.

 

The ATO has recently reminded taxpayers that your tax agent can also view communications the ATO has sent you from within their own tax agent portal, so they don’t need to access your personal myGov account. Your tax agent can also tell whether your employer is using STP.

 

Let us do the hard work

Not sure whether your employer is using STP, or just want to keep tax time as stress-free as possible? Talk to us for expert assistance and advice this tax time for all of your lodgment needs.

Director Identification Numbers Coming Soon

As a part of anti-phoenixing measures, the government is seeking to introduce a “director identification number” (DIN), a permanent and unique identifier to track directors’ relationships across companies. It will apply to any individual appointed as a director of registered body (ie a company, registered foreign company, registered Australian body, or an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation) under the Corporations Act (or the CATSI Act).

 

Being a director of a company comes with many responsibilities, this could soon increase with a government proposal to introduce a “director identification number” (DIN), a unique identifier for each person who consents to being a director. The DIN will permanently be associated with a particular individual even if the directorship with a particular company ceases. Regulators will use the DIN to trace a director’s relationships across companies which will make investigating a director’s potential involvement in repeated unlawful activity easier.

 

Although this initiative was conceived as a part of the anti-phoenixing measures, the introduction of the DIN will also provide other benefits. For example, under the current system, only directors’ details are required to be lodged with ASIC and no verification of identify of directors are carried out. The DIN will improve data integrity and security, as well as improving efficiency in any insolvency process.

 

At this stage, it is proposed that any individual appointed as a director of a registered body (ie a company, registered foreign company, registered Australian body, or an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation) under the Corporations Act (or the CATSI Act) must apply to the registrar for a DIN within 28 days from the date they are appointed.

 

Existing directors have 15 months to apply for DINs from the date the new requirement starts. Directors that fail to apply for a DIN within the applicable timeframe will be liable for civil and criminal penalties.

 

In addition to the penalties for failing to apply for a DIN, there are also civil and criminal penalties which apply to conduct that undermines the requirement. For example, criminal penalties apply for deliberately providing false identity information to the registrar, intentionally providing a false DIN to a government body or relevant body corporate, or internationally applying for multiple DINs.

 

The proposal initially applies only to appointed directors and acting alternate directors, it does not extend to de facto or shadow directors. However, the definition of “eligible officer” may be extended by regulation to any other officers of a registered body as appropriate. This will provide the flexibility to ensure the DIN’s effectiveness going forward. Just as the definition of eligible officer may be extended, the registrar also has the power to exempt an individual from being an eligible officer to avoid unintended consequences.

 

Recently, there have been cases in the media where individuals have unknowingly or unwittingly become directors of sham companies for various nefarious purposes. The DIN proposal inserts a defence for directors appointed without their knowledge, due to either identify theft or forgery. However, it notes that the defendant will carry the evidential burden to adduce or point to evidence that suggests a reasonable possibility that the defence exists, and once that’s done the prosecution bears the burden of proof. The government notes that the evidential burden has been reversed because it is significantly more costly for the prosecution to disprove than for the defence to establish.

 

Where to now?

Apart from ensuring that your identity is safe, we can help if you think you may inadvertently be a director of a company and no longer wish to be. Otherwise, if you’re the director and want to understand more about this potential change including the timeline, contact us today.

Will I Qualify For The Age Pension?

 

As we start to think about retirement, one of the first questions many of us ask is “Will I qualify for the Age Pension?” To help you understand your eligibility, we outline the basic thresholds that apply under the different means tests and what types of assets and income sources are included.

 

Knowing whether you’ll be entitled to the Age Pension is an important part of your retirement planning. Once you reach Age Pension age (66 years from 1 July 2019), you’ll also need to pass two tests: the assets test and income test. If your eligibility works out differently under the two tests, the less favourable result applies.

 

Assets test

If you own your own home, to qualify for the full pension your “assets” must not be worth more than $258,500 (for singles) or $387,500 (for couples). For non-homeowners, these limits are $465,500 and $594,500.Above these thresholds, you may qualify for a reduced pension. However, your entitlement to the pension ceases if your assets are worth more than $567,250 (for single homeowners) or $853,000 (for couples). For non-homeowners, these limits are $774,250 and $1,060,000.

 

So, what “assets” are included? All property holdings other than your principal home count, less any debt secured against the property.

 

There are also special rules for granny flat interests and retirement home contributions, so get advice before moving into these accommodation options.

Investments like shares, loans and term deposits or cash accounts all count, as do your share in any net assets of a business you run and part of the market value of assets in any private trusts or companies you’re considered to “control”.

And once you reach Age Pension age, your superannuation is also included. This includes your accumulation account and most income stream accounts.

 

How you structure your investments could make a big difference. Consider the following tips:

-Selling the family home can significantly impact your assets test position. For example, if you sell and put the proceeds into superannuation, that wealth will become subject to the assets test.

-Paying more off your home mortgage may improve your assets test position. For example, if you meet a condition of release you might consider withdrawing some superannuation benefits and using these to pay down your mortgage.

-Be careful when “gifting” away assets, including selling assets to your children below market value. The value of gifts in excess of $10,000 in a financial year, or $30,000 across five financial years, will count towards the test.

 

In any case, before changing your asset structure you should ask: does it make financial sense to rely on the Age Pension? You may be better off building investments that will generate a higher income for you in retirement.

 

Income test

If you earn up to $172 per fortnight as a single (or $304 as a couple), you can potentially receive the full pension. Above this, your pension entitlement will taper down before ceasing at income of $2,024.40 per fortnight for singles and $3,096.40 for couples. A “Work Bonus” allows pensioners to earn up to $250 from employment per fortnight without it affecting their pension.

 

The income test is broad and includes any gross amounts you earn from anywhere in the world. As well as your income from employment (above the Work Bonus) or business activities, the test also includes things like investment income (eg dividends, trust distributions and rental income), superannuation income streams and even a share of the income in any private trusts or companies you “control”.

 

Your income from certain financial assets is “deemed” at a certain rate. If your actual earnings from these investments exceed the deeming rate, the excess doesn’t count towards the income test. The deeming rules apply to assets like listed shares and managed investments, savings accounts and term deposits, and many superannuation accounts.

 

Plan for a secure retirement 

Contact us to start your retirement planning today. We’ll advise you on the most beneficial way to approach your income from superannuation, the Age Pension and other investments to help you achieve the best retirement outcome.

SMSFs Vs Other Types Of Funds: Some Issues To Consider

 

For many people, SMSFs are a great option for building retirement savings, but they may not be suitable for everyone. Before you jump in, make sure you understand the differences between SMSFs and other types of funds to help you make an informed decision.

 

Thinking about setting up an SMSF? In this first instalment of a two-part series, we explain some of the key differences between SMSFs and public offer funds. Understanding these differences can help you have a deeper discussion with your adviser.

 

Management

While public offer funds are managed by professional licensed trustees, SMSFs are considerably different because management responsibility lies with the members. Every SMSF member must be a trustee of the fund (or, if the trustee is a company, a director of that company).

This is an advantage for those who want full control over how their superannuation is invested and managed. However, it also means the members are responsible for complying with all superannuation laws and regulations – and administrative penalties can apply for non-compliance. Being an SMSF trustee therefore means you need to be prepared to seek the right professional advice when required.

 

If you intend to move overseas for some time (eg for a job posting), an SMSF could be problematic because it may be hit with significant tax penalties if the “central management and control” moves outside Australia.

 

 

On the other hand, members of public offer funds can move overseas without risking these penalties because their fund continues to be managed by a professional Australian trustee.

 

Costs

Costs are a key factor for anyone considering their super options. Fees charged by public offer funds vary, but are generally charged as a percentage of the member’s account balance. Therefore, the higher your balance, the more fees you’ll pay. This is an important point to remember when weighing up a public offer fund against an SMSF.

SMSF costs tend to be more fixed. As well as establishment costs and an annual supervisory levy payable to the ATO, SMSFs must hire an independent auditor annually. Additionally, most SMSF trustees rely on some form of professional assistance, which may include accounting/taxation services, financial advice, administration services, actuarial certificates (in relation to pensions) and asset valuations.

 

These costs may be a more critical factor for those with modestly sized SMSFs. This year, a Productivity Commission inquiry found that larger SMSFs have consistently delivered higher net returns compared with smaller SMSFs, and that SMSFs with under $500,000 in assets have relatively high expense ratios (on average). The Commission’s report has attracted some criticism that it has overstated the true costs of running an SMSF, but in any case, anyone considering an SMSF needs to think carefully about the running costs involved and make an informed decision about whether an SMSF is right for them. For members with modest balances, an SMSF will often be more expensive than a public offer fund, but this needs to be weighed up against the other benefits of an SMSF.

 

Investment flexibility

A major benefit of an SMSF is that the member-trustees have full control over their investment choices. This means they can invest in specific assets, including direct property, that would not be possible in a public offer fund. For example, a business owner wishing to transfer their business premises into superannuation would need an SMSF to achieve this. SMSFs can also take advantage of gearing strategies by borrowing to buy property or even shares through a special “limited recourse” borrowing arrangement.

However, with control comes responsibility. SMSF trustees must create and regularly update an “investment strategy” that specifically addresses things like risk, liquidity and diversification. And of course, the SMSF’s investments must comply with all superannuation laws. In particular, transactions involving related parties (eg leases and acquisitions) can give rise to numerous compliance traps, so SMSF trustees must be prepared to seek advice when required.

 

Need help with your decision?

Contact our office to begin a discussion about whether an SMSF can help you achieve your retirement goals.

NEWS LETTER SIGNUP

ADDRESS

Copyright @ 2022 DSV Partners. Developed By | Swift Computers