Tag Archives: tax agent sydney

Home / Posts tagged "tax agent sydney" ()

Moving Overseas? Three Options For Your SMSF

Taking an extended job posting overseas? If you currently have an SMSF, you’ll need a strategy for managing your super to ensure your fund doesn’t breach any residency rules. Know your options and plan before you go.

 

When SMSF trustees travel overseas for an extended period, there’s a risk their fund’s “central management and control” (CMC) will be considered to move outside Australia. This causes the SMSF to become non-resident, resulting in very hefty penalty taxes. It’s essential to plan for this before departing overseas.

 

The first step is to consider whether your absence will be significant enough to create a CMC risk. A temporaryabsence not exceeding two years isn’t a problem, but whether the ATO considers your absence temporary or permanent will depend on your particular case. Your adviser can take you through the ATO’s guidelines. If you think you’ll have a CMC problem, the next step is to consider possible solutions.

 

Option 1: Appoint an attorney

Usually, every SMSF member must be a trustee (or director of its corporate trustee). However, an SMSF member travelling overseas can avoid CMC problems by appointing a trusted Australian-based person to act as trustee (or director) for them, provided that person holds the member’s enduring power of attorney (EPOA).

 

Sounds simple? Just a word of caution: the SMSF member must resign as a trustee (or director) and be prepared to genuinely hand over control to their attorney.

 

If the member continues to effectively act like a trustee while overseas – for example, by sending significant instructions to their attorney or being involved in strategic decision-making – there’s a risk the CMC of the fund may really be outside Australia.

 

You’ll also need to comply with the separate “active member” test, which broadly requires that while the SMSF is receiving any contributions, at least 50% of the fund’s total asset value attributable to actively contributing members is attributable to resident contributing members. To illustrate this, in a Mum-and-Dad SMSF where both spouses are overseas, a single contribution from either spouse could cause the fund to fail this test and expose the fund to penalties. In other words, you may need to stop SMSF contributions entirely while overseas. Consider making any contributions into a separate public offer fund.

 

Option 2: Wind up

Not prepared to give control of your super to an acquaintance? You might consider rolling your super over to a public offer fund and winding up the SMSF. This option completely removes any CMC stress (as control lies with the professional Australian trustee), and you can make contributions into the large fund without worrying about the “active member” test.

However, you’ll need to sell or transfer out the SMSF’s assets first – real estate, shares and other investments – and this may trigger capital gains tax (CGT) liabilities. These asset disposals will be partly or even fully exempt from CGT if the fund is paying retirement phase pensions, so talk to your adviser about your SMSF’s expected CGT bill if you choose this wind-up option.

 

Option 3: Convert to a small APRA fund

Another option is converting the SMSF into a “small APRA fund” (SAF). Like SMSFs, SAFs have a maximum of four members but instead of being managed by the members they are run by a professional licensed trustee. This takes care of any CMC worries, and on conversion the fund won’t incur any CGT liabilities because the assets remain in the fund – only the trustee structure changes.

The downside is that an SAF may be expensive because you’ll be paying a professional trustee to run your fund. You’ll also need to comply with the “active member test” so, as in Option 1, you may need to stop all contributions into the SAF.

 

Let’s talk

If you’re moving overseas for a while, contact us to start your SMSF planning now. We can help you explore your options and implement a strategy to protect your superannuation against residency problems.

Director Identification Numbers Coming Soon

As a part of anti-phoenixing measures, the government is seeking to introduce a “director identification number” (DIN), a permanent and unique identifier to track directors’ relationships across companies. It will apply to any individual appointed as a director of registered body (ie a company, registered foreign company, registered Australian body, or an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation) under the Corporations Act (or the CATSI Act).

 

Being a director of a company comes with many responsibilities, this could soon increase with a government proposal to introduce a “director identification number” (DIN), a unique identifier for each person who consents to being a director. The DIN will permanently be associated with a particular individual even if the directorship with a particular company ceases. Regulators will use the DIN to trace a director’s relationships across companies which will make investigating a director’s potential involvement in repeated unlawful activity easier.

 

Although this initiative was conceived as a part of the anti-phoenixing measures, the introduction of the DIN will also provide other benefits. For example, under the current system, only directors’ details are required to be lodged with ASIC and no verification of identify of directors are carried out. The DIN will improve data integrity and security, as well as improving efficiency in any insolvency process.

 

At this stage, it is proposed that any individual appointed as a director of a registered body (ie a company, registered foreign company, registered Australian body, or an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation) under the Corporations Act (or the CATSI Act) must apply to the registrar for a DIN within 28 days from the date they are appointed.

 

Existing directors have 15 months to apply for DINs from the date the new requirement starts. Directors that fail to apply for a DIN within the applicable timeframe will be liable for civil and criminal penalties.

 

In addition to the penalties for failing to apply for a DIN, there are also civil and criminal penalties which apply to conduct that undermines the requirement. For example, criminal penalties apply for deliberately providing false identity information to the registrar, intentionally providing a false DIN to a government body or relevant body corporate, or internationally applying for multiple DINs.

 

The proposal initially applies only to appointed directors and acting alternate directors, it does not extend to de facto or shadow directors. However, the definition of “eligible officer” may be extended by regulation to any other officers of a registered body as appropriate. This will provide the flexibility to ensure the DIN’s effectiveness going forward. Just as the definition of eligible officer may be extended, the registrar also has the power to exempt an individual from being an eligible officer to avoid unintended consequences.

 

Recently, there have been cases in the media where individuals have unknowingly or unwittingly become directors of sham companies for various nefarious purposes. The DIN proposal inserts a defence for directors appointed without their knowledge, due to either identify theft or forgery. However, it notes that the defendant will carry the evidential burden to adduce or point to evidence that suggests a reasonable possibility that the defence exists, and once that’s done the prosecution bears the burden of proof. The government notes that the evidential burden has been reversed because it is significantly more costly for the prosecution to disprove than for the defence to establish.

 

Where to now?

Apart from ensuring that your identity is safe, we can help if you think you may inadvertently be a director of a company and no longer wish to be. Otherwise, if you’re the director and want to understand more about this potential change including the timeline, contact us today.

Will I Qualify For The Age Pension?

 

As we start to think about retirement, one of the first questions many of us ask is “Will I qualify for the Age Pension?” To help you understand your eligibility, we outline the basic thresholds that apply under the different means tests and what types of assets and income sources are included.

 

Knowing whether you’ll be entitled to the Age Pension is an important part of your retirement planning. Once you reach Age Pension age (66 years from 1 July 2019), you’ll also need to pass two tests: the assets test and income test. If your eligibility works out differently under the two tests, the less favourable result applies.

 

Assets test

If you own your own home, to qualify for the full pension your “assets” must not be worth more than $258,500 (for singles) or $387,500 (for couples). For non-homeowners, these limits are $465,500 and $594,500.Above these thresholds, you may qualify for a reduced pension. However, your entitlement to the pension ceases if your assets are worth more than $567,250 (for single homeowners) or $853,000 (for couples). For non-homeowners, these limits are $774,250 and $1,060,000.

 

So, what “assets” are included? All property holdings other than your principal home count, less any debt secured against the property.

 

There are also special rules for granny flat interests and retirement home contributions, so get advice before moving into these accommodation options.

Investments like shares, loans and term deposits or cash accounts all count, as do your share in any net assets of a business you run and part of the market value of assets in any private trusts or companies you’re considered to “control”.

And once you reach Age Pension age, your superannuation is also included. This includes your accumulation account and most income stream accounts.

 

How you structure your investments could make a big difference. Consider the following tips:

-Selling the family home can significantly impact your assets test position. For example, if you sell and put the proceeds into superannuation, that wealth will become subject to the assets test.

-Paying more off your home mortgage may improve your assets test position. For example, if you meet a condition of release you might consider withdrawing some superannuation benefits and using these to pay down your mortgage.

-Be careful when “gifting” away assets, including selling assets to your children below market value. The value of gifts in excess of $10,000 in a financial year, or $30,000 across five financial years, will count towards the test.

 

In any case, before changing your asset structure you should ask: does it make financial sense to rely on the Age Pension? You may be better off building investments that will generate a higher income for you in retirement.

 

Income test

If you earn up to $172 per fortnight as a single (or $304 as a couple), you can potentially receive the full pension. Above this, your pension entitlement will taper down before ceasing at income of $2,024.40 per fortnight for singles and $3,096.40 for couples. A “Work Bonus” allows pensioners to earn up to $250 from employment per fortnight without it affecting their pension.

 

The income test is broad and includes any gross amounts you earn from anywhere in the world. As well as your income from employment (above the Work Bonus) or business activities, the test also includes things like investment income (eg dividends, trust distributions and rental income), superannuation income streams and even a share of the income in any private trusts or companies you “control”.

 

Your income from certain financial assets is “deemed” at a certain rate. If your actual earnings from these investments exceed the deeming rate, the excess doesn’t count towards the income test. The deeming rules apply to assets like listed shares and managed investments, savings accounts and term deposits, and many superannuation accounts.

 

Plan for a secure retirement 

Contact us to start your retirement planning today. We’ll advise you on the most beneficial way to approach your income from superannuation, the Age Pension and other investments to help you achieve the best retirement outcome.

Government Tenders And Tax Compliance

Bidding on Commonwealth government tenders could soon be more complex, with the government seeking to exclude businesses that do not have a satisfactory tax record from the tender process. It would apply from 1 July 2019 to all tenders with an estimated value of over $4m (including GST) and includes construction services. Businesses that wish to tender must generally be up-to-date with their tax obligations including both registration and lodgement requirements and not have any outstanding debt.

 

Do you run a business that would like to bid on lucrative Commonwealth government contracts or is likely to do so in the future? From 1 July 2019, the government is seeking to exclude from the tender process those businesses that do not have a “satisfactory tax record (STR)” as a part of its measures to tackle the black economy. The initiative would apply to all tenders with an estimated value of over $4m (including GST) for all goods and/or services including for construction services.

 

Those companies wishing to tender must either provide a satisfactory STR that is valid for at least 2 months or more at the time of the tender closing, or in circumstances where a satisfactory STR has not been issued, provide an STR receipt demonstrating that an STR has been requested from the ATO and then provide the STR no later than 4 business days from the close of tender and before the awarding of the contract.

 

To obtain a satisfactory STR from the ATO, the business must:

-be up-to-date with registration requirements (ie ABN, GST, TFN etc);
-have lodged at least 90% of all income tax returns, FBT returns and BASs that were due in the last 4 years or the period of operation if less than 4 years;
-not have $10,000 or greater in outstanding debt due to the ATO on the date the STR is issued. Note this does not include debt subject to a taxation objection, review or appeal or debt that is a part of a payment plan with the ATO.

 

When an STR is issued, it will usually be valid for 12 months from the time of issue. However, those businesses that do not hold an Australian tax record with the ATO of at least 4 years will generally receive STRs that are only valid for 6 months.

 

There may also be additional requirements in relation to obtaining STRs for subcontractors, foreign companies, partnerships, trusts, joint ventures and tax consolidated groups tendering for Commonwealth government contracts from 1 July 2019.

 

Depending on how well the policy runs in its first year, the government is open to introducing further criteria to determine an STR, such as whether the business:

-meets its superannuation law requirements and PAYG withholding obligations;
-discloses information about its tax affairs under the voluntary tax transparency code;
-has had court order penalties imposed on its directors; and
-its related parties have had convictions for phoenixing behaviour, bribery or corruption.

 

Note this initiative is not designed to replace existing due diligence and checks that are already undertaken, including those relating to business practices that are dishonest, unethical or unsafe, not entering into contracts with businesses that have had a judicial decision against them relating to employee entitlements and who have not satisfied any resulting order (not including decisions under appeal).

 

Want to get your tax obligations in order?

Get on the front foot with your business by getting all your tax obligations in order. Contact us today for all your income tax, FBT and GST needs, we have the expertise to help you with any tax issue, no matter how complex. If you’re planning to expand your business, we can help you map out a plan for a smooth evolution.

Whistle While You Work

 

Have you ever wanted to report financial or corporate misconduct, but been fearful of blowing the whistle? Currently, there is no whistleblower regime within Australia’s tax laws. To remedy this situation the Government has recently unveiled draft legislation with a view to create a single whistleblower protection regime.

 

To remove the barriers to whistleblowing, the Bill under consideration seeks to widen what constitutes an “eligible” whistleblower (ie, who can be a whistleblower) and offers civil compensation for whistleblowers.

 

Minister for Revenue and Financial Services Kelly O’Dwyer said “Breaking ranks and reporting wrongdoing can be a harrowing experience, so it is important people know that they will have access to redress if they are victimised as a result of blowing the whistle.”

 

What is proposed?

Designed to cover the corporate, financial and credit sectors and to protect those who expose tax misconduct, the proposed reforms include:

 

-expanding the protections to a broader class of people, set to include former officers, employees, contractors and suppliers as well as associates and family members of such individuals;

-expanding the types of disclosures that will be protected under the framework;

-allowing disclosures to parliamentarians and the media in certain circumstances, providing certain pre-conditions are satisfied;

-imposing new stringent obligations to maintain the confidentiality of a whistleblower’s identity;

-making it significantly easier for a whistleblower to bring a claim for compensation where he or she has been victimised;

-creating a new civil penalty offence so that law enforcement agencies will be able to take action against companies where the civil standard of proof can be met; and

-requiring all large companies to have a whistleblower policy in place, with penalties for failing to do so.

 

To be protected as a whistleblower in relation to an entity, you must be eligible and the disclosure must be made to:

 

-the ATO and as a discloser you must consider that your information will assist the ATO in performing its duties; or

-an eligible recipient (which includes the auditor of an entity and a registered tax agent (who provides tax agent services to the entity)) and as the discloser you have reasonable grounds to suspect that your information indicates misconduct, or an improper state of affairs or circumstances, in relation to the tax affairs of an entity or an associate of an entity.

 

Protections provided to any eligible whistleblower include:

-immunity from civil or criminal proceedings for making a disclosure;
-protection against an action for breach of contract (including protection against termination of employment);
-protection against victimisation; and
-protection against disclosure of the whistleblower’s identity.

It will become mandatory for public companies and large propriety companies to have a procedure for whistleblowing and those who fail to do so will face a penalty.

 

Do the measures go far enough?

There has been criticism that the new proposed measures do not go far enough. Again, in response to this the Government has formed an Expert Advisory Panel to ensure new measures answer some of the recommendations made by a recent Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services into Whistleblower Protections in the corporate, public and not-for-profit sectors (PJC Report). Advice from the Expert Panel and feedback from consultation will be considered before finalising the legislation for introduction to Parliament in the last sitting week of this year.

The Government will respond to the parliamentary inquiry’s recommendations to create a reward system or bounty for whistleblowers and a whistleblower protection authority.

 

What is the timing?

The proposed date of effect will commence on the day the Bill receive Royal Assent and would apply to whistleblower disclosures made on or after 1 July 2018, including disclosures about events before this date. To allow sufficient time for public companies and large proprietary companies to comply with the requirement to have a whistleblowing policy, those amendments will apply on and after 1 January 2019, or not later than six months after a proprietary company first becomes a large proprietary company.

 

Next steps

We will keep you updated on this area. Do you currently have a whistleblowing procedure and is this promoted openly within your organisation? Given the coming changes, now might be a good time to start thinking about how to put this in place. If you own a company, you will need to keep abreast of the coming reforms. If you have something to report you can start by talking to us as your tax agent.

Black Economy Taskforce: Who Could Be Included

 

In a bid to crack down on tax evasion, the Government has proposed to extend the taxable payment reporting system to two new high risk sectors identified by the Black Economy Taskforce: cleaning services and couriers. The Government cited the improved tax compliance in the building and construction industry as a model of what can be achieved in newly targeted sectors. We will keep you up to date with developments in this area as legislation is enacted.

 

The proposed new laws will require entities that provide courier or cleaning services to report to ATO details of transactions involving contractors. According to ATO guidance, contractors include sole traders (individuals), companies, partnerships, or trusts.

 

For couriers, the proposal captures any service where an entity collects goods (ie, packages, letters, food, flowers, or any other goods) and delivers them to another location.

 

The Government is hoping the imposition of additional compliance will encourage tax compliance, particularly in the food delivery market, which is gaining in popularity.

 

Similarly, cleaning services have also been broadly defined in the proposal to refer to any service where a structure, vehicle, place, surface, machinery or equipment has been subject to a process in which dirt or similar material has been removed from it.

 

What will you need to declare?

If you employ couriers or cleaners

Entities captured by this measure will need to lodge an annual report to the ATO detailing each contractor’s ABN, name, address, gross amount paid for the financial year (including GST) and the total GST included in the gross amount that was paid. If this applies to you and you employ couriers or cleaners you may also be required to provide additional information, such as the contractor’s phone number, email address and bank account details. In essence, companies such as deliveroo, ubereats, foodora, as well as a host of other players, could face the increased compliance costs of having to lodge hundreds, if not thousands, of these reports to the ATO each year.

 

If you contract as a courier or cleaner

If you are a courier or a cleaner (and you provide contract services), the data collected about you will be used in data-matching programs to ensure that all of your income is reported correctly to the ATO. If you are contracted to a delivery company or a cleaning company you will need to keep careful records of what you are being paid. This is particularly important if you only work for these companies on an occasional or part-time basis.

 

How about the timing?

Should this proposal pass as law, the first annual report will be for the 2018–2019 financial year.

 

What to do next

Any relevant business that is required to report will need to collect relevant information from 1 July 2018, with the report due by 28 August 2019. Information from the reports (which will be data matched with information provided by contractors) will apply on tax returns for the 2018–2019 income year. Speak to us if you think this could be relevant to you.

Reverse Mortgage Lending And Retirement

Since the global financial crisis, demand for reverse mortgages have grown steadily. It allows older individuals, perhaps retirees, to unlock the equity in their homes while they continue to live in the property. However, reverse mortgages may not be all it’s cracked up to be. A recent review by ASIC found that borrowers had a poor understanding of the risks and future costs of their loan, inadequately documented long-term financial objectives, and lack of protection for non-borrowers who live in the property. When it comes to reverse mortgages, it may be a case of buyer beware.

 

Reverse mortgages are a credit product that allows older individuals to achieve their immediate financial goals by using the equity in their home to borrow amounts. The loan typically does not need to be repaid until a later time (ie when the borrower has vacated the property or has passed away). For older individuals who own their home but few other assets, the advantage of reverse mortgages is that it allows them to draw on the wealth locked up in their homes while they continue to live in the property. As good as it sounds, reverse mortgages may not be all it’s cracked up to be.

 

ASIC recently reviewed data on 17,000 reverse mortgages, 111 consumer loan files, lender policies, procedures and complaints, along with in-depth interviews with 30 borrowers and 30 industry and consumer stakeholders. The review evaluated the effectiveness of enhanced responsible lending obligations and examined 5 brands who collectively lent 99% of the dollar value of approved reverse mortgage loans from 2013 to 2017.

 

The average size of a reverse mortgage loan was found to be around $118,627 with an average home value of $632,598 (average loan-to-value ratio 26%). Borrowers typically took out reverse mortgages to pay for daily expenses, bills and debts, home improvements and car expenses. Unlike other loans, reverse mortgage borrowers had limited choices due to a lack of competition, with 2 credit licensees writing 80% of the dollar value of new loans from 2013 to 2017.

 

The review also found that borrowers had a poor understanding of the risks and future costs of their loan, and generally failed to consider how their loan could impact their ability to afford their possible future needs. In addition, it found reverse mortgages were a more expensive form of credit compared to standard variable owner occupier home loans with the interest rates typically being 2% higher and as no repayments are required, the interest compounds.

 

According to ASIC, lenders have a clear role to play and in nearly all the loan files reviewed, the borrower’s long-term needs or financial objectives were not adequately documented. 

 

This is important as borrowers can never owe the bank more than the value of their property, however, depending on when a borrower obtains their loan, how much they borrow, and economic conditions (eg property prices and interest rates), they may not have enough equity remaining in the home for longer term needs such as aged care.

 

The other concerning finding by ASIC is that some reverse mortgages may not protect other residents in the home. For example, if a borrower vacates the property or passes away, the borrower or their estate can often only afford to pay off the loan balance of a reverse mortgage by selling the property. This can require non-borrowers still living in the home (ie a spouse, relative, or adult children) to move out unless the contract contains a “tenancy protection” provision allowing them to remain in the home for a period of time.

 

Only one lender in the review offered a limited option to include a tenancy protection provision in their loan contract which lasted for one year after the death of the borrower with certain conditions. Other lenders in the review would only protect non-borrower residents if they added their name to the loan contract. ASIC notes that under enhanced consumer protections, lenders must give potential borrowers a prescribed tenancy protection warning, which did not occur in a majority of the cases.

 

Thinking of getting a reverse mortgage?

If you think a reverse mortgage would suit your retirement needs, come and speak to us today to ensure that you get the full picture before you sign up to anything. We can help you understand all the terms and protections to make the most out of your retirement.

Alternative Dispute Resolution Process

 

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not only used to resolve substantive disputes, and can be used to clarify or limit issues, and remove barriers created by relationship issues between you and the ATO. Usually, if your dispute is not very complex, in-house facilitation may be used. More complex issues will usually be outsourced to an external practitioner. Working out if the ADR process is right for you can save you time, money and heartache in any dispute or potential dispute.

 

If you’re involved in a dispute with the ATO, going straight to the Court or Tribunals may not be the most time or cost-effective way to proceed. As a taxpayer, you can access the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process in any dispute with the ATO, which used appropriately may be the most cost-effective and efficient way to resolve disputes. Basically, it involves using an impartial person to help resolve the dispute or at least narrow the issues between the parties.

 

Broadly, the ADR processes encompass 4 branches, facilitative, advisory, determinative, and blended dispute resolution.

 

Facilitative

In this branch, independent ADR practitioners assists the parties to identify the issues, formulate solutions, and consider any alternatives with the goal of reaching an agreement either about the entire dispute or some issues within the dispute. Examples of the facilitative processes include:

*Mediation – an external practitioner is engaged to facilitate the process. The parties usually split the costs involved where mediation is voluntarily entered into. Note that mediators do not normally give advice, unless the parties have requested an advisory/evaluative mediation or conciliation.

 

*In-house facilitation – a trained independent ATO officer facilitates the process. There are no costs involved in the process. However, the facilitator will not establish facts, give advice, decide on who is “right or wrong”. The facilitator’s function is to guide the parties through the process and assist them to ensure where are open lines of communication and that messages are correctly received.
Advisory

 

This process may also be referred to a neutral evaluation (or early neutral evaluation) and involves the parties presenting their arguments to an independent practitioner who provides advice on some or all of the facts of the dispute, the law, and possible or beneficial outcomes.

 

In tax and superannuation disputes, the practitioner will usually have substantial experience in tax law so they can give an insight into a decision a Court or Tribunal may make if the dispute proceeds to litigation. Once the practitioner gives the advice, it is up to each party whether they accept the advice and how they will use that information. For example, if both parties hear from the independent practitioner that they will not be completely successful in their case before the Tribunal or Court, they may decide to enter into a negotiated agreement to resolve the dispute rather than going through the costly legal proceedings.

 

Determinative

In this process, an independent practitioner evaluates the dispute and makes a determination, an example of this includes arbitration. However, the ATO notes that determinative processes are not generally appropriate for ATO disputes as it can incur similar costs and delays as litigation, but lack the openness and transparency of Court of Tribunal decisions.

 

Blended dispute resolution

This is where an independent practitioner plays multiple roles such as conciliation and conferencing, and may also facilitate discussions and provide advice on the merits of the dispute. The facilitator will usually have qualifications in the area of the dispute. This process is usually used by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in tax and superannuation disputes in the early stages of the proceedings.

 

I have a dispute, what should I do?

Certainly, in any dispute or potential dispute emotions will be running high, and rash decisions may be made; but keep a cool head to work out which option best suits your circumstances will save you lots of time, money, and heartache. If you’re not sure if the ADR process is right for you, we can help you work out your options.

Travel Allowance Or LAFHA: Which Applies To You

 

Travel Allowance or living-away-from-home allowance (LAFHA)? Understanding the difference between these two allowances can be complex, particularly when there is the perception of an overlap. The allowances are in fact very different, and have different consequences for the person receiving them.

 

An amount paid by your employer to cover expenses such as accommodation, food, or drinks while you travel for business is typically know as a travel allowance. There is also another type of allowance, called the living-away-from-home allowance (LAFHA), which compensates you for additional expenses when you are required to live away from home due to work duties. So what is the difference between the two?

 

Travel allowances are considered to be assessable income and PAYG withholding may apply. Any expenses incurred on meals and incidental expenses may be deductible against the allowance if certain criteria are met. Living-away-from-home allowance, however, is subject to Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) and is non-assessable, non-exempt income. Costs of meals and incidental expenses will not be deductible since you are considered to be living away from home and not travelling.

 

There are no specific set criteria to know whether you are receiving a travel or a LAFHA allowance. The circumstances of each case will determine which one is more appropriate.

 

The ATO considers the following factors, although not determinative on their own, to be important:

-time spent working away from home – the longer you spend working away from home, the more likely that you are living away from home and not travelling;

-whether you had a usual place of residence at a previous location – you would only be considered to be living away from home where it is reasonable to conclude that you will return to your previous residence when work at the new location ends;

-the nature of accommodation – if you live in settled accommodation, such as a house, unit or apartment, it may indicate that you are living away from home. This is particularly true if the accommodation has the amenities common to a home, such as an equipped kitchen and laundry. On the other hand, if you are staying in a hotel or in transitory accommodation, then it is more likely that you are not living away from home and are merely travelling;

-whether you are, or can be accompanied by family or visited by family or friends – if your family accompany you during the entirety of your stay at a new location then it is likely that you have relocated and are not living away from home or travelling. All meals, living and incidental expenses will be considered to be private and not deductible.

-conversely, if your family members accompany you for a short stay at your new location and subsequently return to live at the family’s permanent home, while you continue to work at the new temporary location, then it is likely that you will be considered to be living away from home.

 

Usually, your employer should tell you which allowance you’re getting, and a big clue is contained in your payment summary. Travel allowances are usually shown in the allowances section of the payment summary and contribute to your overall taxable income and affect the amount of Medicare levy payable. LAFHA is usually included in the reportable fringe benefits section and does not contribute to your overall taxable income or affect the amount of Medicare levy payable. It does, however, affect other things including the tax offset for eligible spouse superannuation contributions, HELP repayments, child support obligations, and entitlement to certain income-tested government benefits.

 

If you receive a travel allowance, expenses can be deducted without documentary evidence where it is considered by the ATO to be “reasonable”. However, if you have a lot of expenses that may go over the reasonable amount set by the ATO, it would be wise to keep documentary evidence, such as receipts and supporting evidence (eg, bank or credit card statements).

 

Want to find out more?

Do you want to know if your income or other government benefits will be affected by the allowance you receive? Ensure that you don’t get a big surprise when your tax is due. Talk to us about this today.

Budget 2019: Superannuation Measures For Over-60s

If you’re in your 60s, this year’s federal Budget brings some good news: the Coalition is relaxing some of the contributions rules for your age group, giving you more time and opportunities to put away funds for retirement. Changes to the work test, “bring-forward” rules and spouse contributions are all on the cards. Find out what these proposals mean for you.

 

No major reforms to superannuation were announced in this year’s federal Budget. But with an election around the corner, the Coalition has pledged to help Australians aged over 60 save for retirement by extending the age limits for a number of existing contributions measures. These changes are proposed to take effect from 1 July 2020.

 

Work test pushed out

A returned Coalition government would give retirees an extra two years to make contributions without having to meet the “work test”. Under current rules, anyone aged 65 or over must satisfy this test in order to make voluntary contributions (essentially, any contributions other than compulsory employer contributions or “downsizer” contributions).

 

The test requires that the person is “gainfully employed” for at least 40 hours in any 30-day consecutive period during the financial year in which the contributions are made. The Coalition now proposes that this test will only apply from age 67 – welcome news for retirees and people with irregular work patterns.

 

From 1 July 2019, there will be a 12-month exemption from the work test for recent retirees aged between 65 and 74 years with a total superannuation balance below $300,000. This is already legislated. It is not yet known whether the Coalition would scrap the exemption beyond 1 July 2020 or retain it to supplement the new work test age of 67. People in this age group should consult their adviser to stay informed of changes following the upcoming election.

 

 

More time to “bring forward” contributions

The Coalition will also give Australians an extra two years to make large contributions into super. The annual cap on non-concessional contributions (NCCs) is $100,000, but individuals aged under 65 at any point in a financial year may “bring forward” up to two additional years’ worth of NCCs (depending on the size of their total superannuation balance) to make a contribution of up to $300,000. The Coalition now wants to extend the scheme to anyone under 67 years, benefitting older Australians who wish to contribute a large amount from, for example, an inheritance, proceeds from the sale of an asset or another source of funds.

 

Take care as you approach age 67 as some timing traps may arise. This is due to the interaction of the bring-forward rules with the work test (and whether the 12-month exemption from the work test will be retained in future). Sounds complicated? With expert advice it needn’t be, so the key is to carefully plan your contributions in advance with your professional adviser.

 

Spouse contributions extended

The age limit for receiving spouse contributions (contributions made by your spouse on your behalf directly to your superannuation fund member account) is proposed to increase from 69 to 74.

 

Making a spouse contribution is a great way to boost your spouse’s super and potentially save tax. If your spouse earns $37,000 or less, you may claim a maximum tax offset of $540 when you make a $3,000 contribution on their behalf during the income year. (The amount of offset reduces for spouse incomes above $37,000, before tapering off at $40,000.) The Budget proposal to extend the age limit for receiving a spouse contribution gives couples an extra five years to take advantage of this tax offset.

 

Help is at hand

With all the age limits and rules that apply, planning a contributions strategy for your 60s is essential. Talk to us today to start your planning. We’ll help you navigate any rule changes following the upcoming federal election to make sure you maximise the opportunities available to you.

NEWS LETTER SIGNUP

ADDRESS

Copyright @ 2015 DSV Partners. Developed By | Swift Computers