Tag Archives: tax agent sydney

Home / Posts tagged "tax agent sydney" ()

Capital Gains Tax And Death: It’s Not The End Of The World

There’s nothing as certain as death and taxes, but tax on death is not so clear. The good news is that when an asset passes to a beneficiary, capital gains tax (CGT) generally does not apply. But down the track when the beneficiary decides to sell that asset, there are many forks in the path.

 

There is enough pain and anguish when someone dies, so fortunately there is, in most cases at least, no duty on assets that form part of the deceased’s estate and are passed to a beneficiary, or their legal personal representative (LPR). But as with life, the rules regarding death and CGT are not meant to be easy, particularly when that asset is a “dwelling”.

This article will explore the CGT consequences for the deceased estate and the beneficiary of:

-the transmission on death, of an asset, specifically a dwelling

-the subsequent sale of that dwelling.

 

CGT on the inheritance of a dwelling

Generally, the law says that there is no CGT liability for the deceased on the transmission of an asset to a beneficiary.

 

The beneficiary is considered to be the new owner of the inherited asset on the day the deceased person died and CGT does not apply to that asset.

 

This applies to all assets, including a dwelling.

The exception is where the beneficiary is a “tax advantaged entity” (TAE), such as a charity, foreign resident or complying superannuation entity. In this case the deceased estate (not the TAE) is liable for any capital gain or loss attached to the asset. This will need to be taken into account in the deceased’s final tax return in the year in which he or she died.

 

CGT on the sale of an inherited dwelling

If the beneficiary subsequently sells the bequeathed asset, this may create a CGT “event”, depending on the status of the property, when it was purchased, when the deceased died and whether the sale qualifies for the CGT “main residence” exemption.

 

CGT liability on the sale will be determined by whether:

-the deceased died before, on or after 20 September 1985 (when CGT was introduced); and

-the dwelling was acquired before, on or after 20 September 1985; and if acquired post-CGT, whether the deceased died before, on or after 20 August 1996.

 

The following table identifies when CGT applies to the sale of an inherited dwelling and the relevant cost base. It refers to these two conditions:

 

Condition 1: Dwelling was sold (note that this means settlement must have occurred) within two years of the person’s death. This exemption applies regardless of whether the beneficiary used the dwelling as their main residence or produced income from it during this period. The two-year period can be extended at the Commissioner’s discretion. New safe harbour rules allow executors and beneficiaries to self-assess this discretion provided a number of conditions are met.

 

Condition 2: From the deceased’s death until the sale, the dwelling was not used to produce income, and was the main residence of one or more of the following:

-the deceased’s spouse;

-an individual who had a right to occupy it under the deceased’s will; or

-the beneficiary.
 

CGT on the sale of an inherited dwelling

Dwelling acquired by deceased (D)                  Date of death                         Subsequent disposal by beneficiary (B)
Pre-CGT (ie before 20 September 1985)                      Pre-CGT                                                    No CGT

Exception: dwelling subject to major capital improvements post-CGT  and used to produce assessable income

 

 

Pre-CGT                                                                            Post-CGT                             No CGT if: Condition 1 or 2 is satisfied
If CGT applies, B’s cost base is the dwelling’s cost base in D’s hands at the date of death

 

 

 

Post-CGT                                                                  Before 20 August 1996                    No CGT if:

 

Condition 2 is satisfied; and D always used dwelling as main residence (MR) and did not use it to produce assessable income

If CGT applies, B’s cost base is the cost base of the dwelling in D’s hands at the date of death

 

On or after                                No CGT if:

21 August 1996

 

Condition 1 or 2 is satisfied; and just before D died dwelling was used as MR and was  not being used to produce assessable income

 

If CGT applies, B’s cost base is the market value of the dwelling at the date of  death

 

In calculating the CGT, the beneficiary or the LPR cannot use any of the deceased’s unapplied net capital losses against the net capital gains.

 

Guidance at hand

If you have inherited a dwelling and are in the dark about the CGT impact of hanging onto it or selling it, we can guide you through the minefield and minimise any tax consequences.

Employees Benefit From New Insolvency Decision

Do you know if the company you work for is a corporate trustee of a trust or a company trading in its own right? Many employees wouldn’t have a clue and until recently, if you were an employee of a corporate trustee and it became insolvent, your claim for employee entitlements wouldn’t have any more weight than all the other unsecured creditors calling for their piece of the liquidated pie. A series of court cases, most recently a decision by the Federal Court, has now changed that in your favour.

 

If you worked for a company and it goes bust, the law gives you priority to be paid your entitlements including wages and superannuation. There is what’s called a priority regime that applies when a company becomes insolvent.

 

Until recently, the priority status enjoyed by employees of a company trading in its own right did not apply to employees of a corporate trustee when it became insolvent. In the latter case, employees would have the same priority as, and have to compete for payment with, the unsecured creditors.

 

Courts say priority regime applies to trusts

A landmark court case in the Full Federal Court has recently decided that employees of an insolvent corporate trading trust should be paid their entitlements subject to the same order of priorities that applied to employees of an insolvent company.

 

This confirms the decision of a Victorian case, decided on appeal earlier this year. In the Victorian trial case, before the decision was successfully appealed, the judge held that the priority regime didn’t apply to trust assets and therefore employees of an insolvent corporate trustee should be denied the priority payment of their unpaid entitlements. This decision would leave the employees on equal pegging with the other unsecured trust creditors, instead of receiving preferential treatment for their employee entitlements.

 

The appeal decision recognises that employees need a leg up the creditors’ ladder when a company goes under and they should not be disadvantaged by working for a company that operates through a trust rather than for a company trading in its own right.

 

There have been many conflicting court cases over the years in this area of employee entitlements in the event of insolvency.

This uncertainty has for now been resolved by the Federal Court, confirming the decision in the Victorian appeal court that there is a level playing field for employees: whether they work for a corporate trustee of a trust or a company trading in its own right, they are entitled to the same priority of payment.

 

Help in a complex area

If you work for a business that’s becoming or is insolvent, and you need help to get your fair share of the proceeds, we can provide the experienced advice you need.

Valuing Your SMSF’s Assets: Know The Requirements

Recording the market value of your SMSF’s assets is an important trustee responsibility. But how do you prove “market value”, how often must you value assets and when do you need to hire an expert valuer? Fortunately, with some help from the ATO’s guidelines and your professional adviser, asset valuation needn’t be a headache for trustees.

 

To keep your SMSF’s auditor and the ATO happy, it’s essential to take asset valuation seriously. By law, SMSFs must record all of their assets at “market value” – an important requirement that allows funds to accurately report the value of members’ benefits. Additionally, there are a number of SMSF investment rules that specifically require a “market value” to be assessed, so failing to correctly value assets could land SMSF trustees in hot water.

 

For example, SMSFs are generally prohibited from acquiring assets from related parties – with some notable exceptions such as “business real property” (broadly, 100% commercial property) and listed shares. However, these exceptions only apply if the assets in question are acquired at market value. Knowing the market value of fund assets is also essential to complying with the in-house asset rules and certain laws covering the sale of collectables and personal use assets.

 

What is market value?

Under superannuation law, “market value” is defined as the amount that a willing buyer would reasonably be expected to pay in a hypothetical scenario where all of the following conditions are met:

-the buyer and seller deal with each other at arm’s length;
-the sale occurs after proper marketing of the asset; and
-the buyer and the seller act “knowledgeably and prudentially”.

 

How does this work in practice? In an audit, your SMSF’s auditor (and ultimately the ATO) will expect you to be able to provide evidence supporting your valuation. This should be based on “objective and supportable” data, and should demonstrate a “fair and reasonable” valuation method.

 

The ATO says a method is fair and reasonable if it is a good faith, rational process that takes into account all relevant factors and can be explained to a third party.

 

In general, it’s not compulsory to use a qualified external valuer (that is, someone who holds formal valuation qualifications or has specific skills or experience in valuing certain assets). It’s the methodology and supporting evidence that makes a valuation sound, not the identity of the person who performs the valuation. However, there are some situations where using a qualified valuer is compulsory or recommended:

 

-If your SMSF holds collectables or personal use assets (eg artwork), you must by law use a valuation from a qualified independent valuer before disposing of such assets to related parties.

-The ATO also recommends that you consider using a qualified independent valuer for any asset that represents a large proportion of your fund’s total value, or if the valuation is likely to be complex or difficult given the nature of the asset.

 

Specific assets

As noted above there are specific requirements for collectables, and the ATO has also developed guidelines for other classes of assets.

The ATO says real estate doesn’t need to be valued each year, unless there has been a significant event since the last valuation that may affect the value. This could include market volatility or changes to the property.

Listed shares and managed units are easy to value, and should therefore be valued at the end of each financial year. Unlisted shares and units (eg investments in private companies or trusts) are more difficult to value than listed assets and require consideration of a range of factors. Trustees should seek professional assistance with valuing unlisted investments.

 

Need help getting it right?

For some assets, determining market value can be a complex process that requires professional input. Don’t go it alone – get the right advice and ensure your valuations stand up to ATO scrutiny. Contact our office to discuss the ATO guidelines in more detail or to begin assessing your SMSF’s valuation needs.

Binding Nominations: Make Sure Your Super Passes Into The Right Hands

Your superannuation balance is probably one of your biggest assets – perhaps up there with the family home. It’s therefore vital to plan for how that money will be distributed on your death. Find out how a binding nomination can give you peace of mind that your wishes will be complied with when you’ve passed on.

 

When you pass away, your superannuation benefits do not automatically form part of your estate. Instead, they’re paid out by the trustee of your superannuation fund. So, what can you do to ensure your super is paid out in accordance with your wishes? For many people, a binding death benefit nomination (BDBN) is an appropriate safeguard to put in place.

 

How does a BDBN work?

If you don’t make any nomination during your lifetime about how your superannuation benefits should be paid on your death, the trustee has discretion to decide who will receive your benefits and in what form. Under superannuation law, your death benefits can be paid to either, or a combination, of:

 

-your “legal personal representative” (LPR) – effectively, the executors of your estate (which means those superannuation benefits will then be dealt with by your will); and/or

-one or more of your “dependants” directly, which include your spouse, children (of any age) and anyone with whom you were in an “interdependency relationship”.

 

Where the trustee decides to pay some benefits directly to a dependant, the trustee can also decide whether to pay your benefits as a lump sum or pension. This is a lot of discretion for the trustee! If you’d prefer to have certainty about how your benefits will be paid, consider making a BDBN.

 

This is a written direction given to the trustee specifying where your death benefits should be paid (and optionally, in what form). Provided the BDBN is valid and still in effect when you die, the trustee is bound to follow it.

 

Making a valid BDBN

You should seek expert assistance when preparing a BDBN, especially if you’re an SMSF member. In recent years, legal disputes before the courts (eg between surviving family members) over the terms of BDBNs have highlighted the traps that can arise. Here we outline a few key principles to keep in mind.

 

First, the trustee can’t follow a BDBN to the extent the payments would breach superannuation law. This means your BDBN can only specify the permitted recipients discussed above (your LPR and/or “dependants”). There are also restrictions on when your children can receive benefits in pension form.

 

Second, for non-SMSFs, a BDBN must meet various documentation requirements in order to be valid, such as being witnessed correctly by two eligible adult witnesses, among other requirements. For SMSFs, these requirements vary, depending on the particular terms of the SMSF’s deed.

 

Third, the BDBN must work in harmony with other relevant legal documentation. This includes:

-The fund’s deed (as mentioned above): the terms of SMSF deeds vary greatly. SMSF members must therefore ensure their BDBN is permitted, valid and enforceable under their fund’s deed.

-Pension documentation: if you’re receiving a pension just before your death, any terms of the pension documentation that contradict your BDBN (eg a stipulation that the pension is to revert to a certain beneficiary) may cause confusion and legal uncertainty.

-Your will: if your BDBN directs your benefits to your estate, your will can be tailored to ensure the benefits pass to specific beneficiaries in the most tax-effective manner.

 

Expiry dates

For non-SMSFs, a BDBN expires after three years. In an SMSF, a BDBN can potentially last indefinitely, but there’s a trap: many SMSF deeds impose a three-year expiry anyway!

In any event, it’s good practice to review your BDBN every few years or whenever a major life change occurs (eg, marriage, divorce or death of a dependant).

 

Need to make a BDBN?

Contact our office to begin your superannuation succession plan. We’ll help you ensure your wealth passes into the right hands, giving you maximum control and peace of mind.

Hiring Independent Contractors: Do You Need To Pay Super?

Your business may be required to make superannuation contributions for some independent contractors, even if they have an Australian Business Number (ABN). Contractors hired under a contract “principally for labour” are captured – but what does that mean? Find out what test the ATO applies and check whether your business has its super obligations covered.

 

Hiring independent contractors can be a flexible staffing solution for many businesses, not only to meet fluctuating workloads but also to help fill gaps with specific skills. But did you know that some workers who are genuinely independent contractors are still entitled to compulsory superannuation contributions?

 

If a worker is not an employee in the general sense but is hired under “a contract that is wholly or principally for the labour of the person”, the worker is deemed an employee for super purposes, even if they have an ABN.

 

This means the hirer must make superannuation guarantee (SG) contributions of 9.5% (in relation to the part of the contract that is for labour). Hirers can’t meet this obligation simply by paying the worker an additional 9.5% – they must actually make contributions to the worker’s superannuation fund.

 

So what sort of contracts are captured? The ATO’s view is that a contract is “wholly or principally for labour” when three key requirements are all met.

 

First, the person must be paid “mainly” for their labour (if not entirely), and the ATO interprets this as “more than half the dollar value” of the contract being for labour. Labour includes not only physical work, but also mental and artistic effort.

 

The second requirement is that the person is paid for their labour, not to achieve a result. Being paid by the hour suggests the person is paid for their labour. In contrast, when a person is paid a fixed sum for a specific output, this suggests they’re paid for a result.

 

Third, the person must personally perform the work and must not be able to delegate to someone else. The ATO notes that many contractors are often hired based on their personal skills, qualifications and experience, so many contractors will typically be unable to delegate their work.

 

What types of work can this affect?

All kinds of workers can be captured. Typical examples might include freelancers such as programmers, editors, graphic designers or administrative support workers who are paid by the hour (not for a specific result) and can’t delegate the work to someone else. Similarly, labourers and other contractors performing physical work could be captured.

 

The rule can also extend to individuals in sophisticated business structuring arrangements. In a recent decision (Moffet v Dental Corporation Pty Ltd), the Federal Court found that a dentist who had sold his dental practice to a third party and continued to work as a dentist for that practice was an independent contractor, but had been working under a contract “wholly or principally for labour”. The new dental practice owners were therefore required to make minimum SG contributions for him.

 

The dentist was earning a percentage commission of the fees collected from patients, but was also contractually required to pay a “shortfall” amount to the dental practice in the event the practice’s annual cash flow fell below a set target – a risk not usually born by a worker in an employment-like arrangement. This case illustrates how even individuals like former business owners who agree to perform services under complex contractual arrangements can potentially be entitled to SG contributions.

 

Not sure about your contractors?

Don’t wait for the ATO to come knocking. Contact us today for assistance in reviewing your contractor arrangements and ensure your business is protected.

“Ipso Facto” Escape Hatch Prohibited Under Insolvency Reforms

There was a time when, if a company got into financial difficulty the contracting party could terminate the contract, even if the company had been meeting all its obligations. The “ipso facto” clause was the contract’s device that allowed this termination to take place. A Latin term that means, rather unhelpfully, “by the fact itself”, the ipso facto clause acted like a trip switch in a fuse box that the contractor could flick at the occurrence of an insolvency event, pulling the plug on the contract and bringing an end to the business trading. Not so now.

 

As part of the sweeping insolvency reforms that came into operation on 1 July 2018, new legislation has prohibited ipso facto clauses that once provided for a contract to self-destruct in the event of insolvency.

 

An insolvency event can include voluntary administration, receivership and schemes of arrangement. These are all processes where the company is trying to work its way out of financial difficulty.

 

The activation of the clauses has been particularly prevalent in the construction industry where parties seek to withdraw the obligation to continue providing their services in what they consider to be a risky business environment.

 

Ipso facto and safe harbour share common purpose

The new ipso facto provisions and the safe harbour reforms (discussed in previous articles) share a common purpose – to discourage directors and contracting parties from bailing down the escape hatch, and to get them to keep trading.

 

This essence of the ipso facto reform, that only applies to contracts, agreements or arrangements entered into after 1 July 2018, is to provide for a “stay” against the enforcement of those ipso facto clauses.

 

In other words, any action taken by a party relying on that ipso facto clause to weasel its way out of a commitment to stay the distance of the contract, would be suspended to allow the company to continue trading for the benefit of its creditors and employees, until the administration ends or the company is wound up.

 

A contracting party can apply to the court for an order that a stay on enforcement rights be lifted if it is appropriate in the interests of justice or, in the case of a scheme of arrangement, if the scheme was not for the purpose of the company being wound up in insolvency.

 

The very positive side of the change for creditors and employees is that the company experiencing financial difficulty can continue to trade while it still meets its obligations under the contract – without the other party pulling the contractual rug from under its feet.

 

Help at a time of change

With all the changes taking place in insolvency, we can guide you through the opportunities provided by the complex reforms.

Moving Overseas? Three Options For Your SMSF

Taking an extended job posting overseas? If you currently have an SMSF, you’ll need a strategy for managing your super to ensure your fund doesn’t breach any residency rules. Know your options and plan before you go.

 

When SMSF trustees travel overseas for an extended period, there’s a risk their fund’s “central management and control” (CMC) will be considered to move outside Australia. This causes the SMSF to become non-resident, resulting in very hefty penalty taxes. It’s essential to plan for this before departing overseas.

 

The first step is to consider whether your absence will be significant enough to create a CMC risk. A temporaryabsence not exceeding two years isn’t a problem, but whether the ATO considers your absence temporary or permanent will depend on your particular case. Your adviser can take you through the ATO’s guidelines. If you think you’ll have a CMC problem, the next step is to consider possible solutions.

 

Option 1: Appoint an attorney

Usually, every SMSF member must be a trustee (or director of its corporate trustee). However, an SMSF member travelling overseas can avoid CMC problems by appointing a trusted Australian-based person to act as trustee (or director) for them, provided that person holds the member’s enduring power of attorney (EPOA).

 

Sounds simple? Just a word of caution: the SMSF member must resign as a trustee (or director) and be prepared to genuinely hand over control to their attorney.

 

If the member continues to effectively act like a trustee while overseas – for example, by sending significant instructions to their attorney or being involved in strategic decision-making – there’s a risk the CMC of the fund may really be outside Australia.

 

You’ll also need to comply with the separate “active member” test, which broadly requires that while the SMSF is receiving any contributions, at least 50% of the fund’s total asset value attributable to actively contributing members is attributable to resident contributing members. To illustrate this, in a Mum-and-Dad SMSF where both spouses are overseas, a single contribution from either spouse could cause the fund to fail this test and expose the fund to penalties. In other words, you may need to stop SMSF contributions entirely while overseas. Consider making any contributions into a separate public offer fund.

 

Option 2: Wind up

Not prepared to give control of your super to an acquaintance? You might consider rolling your super over to a public offer fund and winding up the SMSF. This option completely removes any CMC stress (as control lies with the professional Australian trustee), and you can make contributions into the large fund without worrying about the “active member” test.

However, you’ll need to sell or transfer out the SMSF’s assets first – real estate, shares and other investments – and this may trigger capital gains tax (CGT) liabilities. These asset disposals will be partly or even fully exempt from CGT if the fund is paying retirement phase pensions, so talk to your adviser about your SMSF’s expected CGT bill if you choose this wind-up option.

 

Option 3: Convert to a small APRA fund

Another option is converting the SMSF into a “small APRA fund” (SAF). Like SMSFs, SAFs have a maximum of four members but instead of being managed by the members they are run by a professional licensed trustee. This takes care of any CMC worries, and on conversion the fund won’t incur any CGT liabilities because the assets remain in the fund – only the trustee structure changes.

The downside is that an SAF may be expensive because you’ll be paying a professional trustee to run your fund. You’ll also need to comply with the “active member test” so, as in Option 1, you may need to stop all contributions into the SAF.

 

Let’s talk

If you’re moving overseas for a while, contact us to start your SMSF planning now. We can help you explore your options and implement a strategy to protect your superannuation against residency problems.

Director Identification Numbers Coming Soon

As a part of anti-phoenixing measures, the government is seeking to introduce a “director identification number” (DIN), a permanent and unique identifier to track directors’ relationships across companies. It will apply to any individual appointed as a director of registered body (ie a company, registered foreign company, registered Australian body, or an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation) under the Corporations Act (or the CATSI Act).

 

Being a director of a company comes with many responsibilities, this could soon increase with a government proposal to introduce a “director identification number” (DIN), a unique identifier for each person who consents to being a director. The DIN will permanently be associated with a particular individual even if the directorship with a particular company ceases. Regulators will use the DIN to trace a director’s relationships across companies which will make investigating a director’s potential involvement in repeated unlawful activity easier.

 

Although this initiative was conceived as a part of the anti-phoenixing measures, the introduction of the DIN will also provide other benefits. For example, under the current system, only directors’ details are required to be lodged with ASIC and no verification of identify of directors are carried out. The DIN will improve data integrity and security, as well as improving efficiency in any insolvency process.

 

At this stage, it is proposed that any individual appointed as a director of a registered body (ie a company, registered foreign company, registered Australian body, or an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation) under the Corporations Act (or the CATSI Act) must apply to the registrar for a DIN within 28 days from the date they are appointed.

 

Existing directors have 15 months to apply for DINs from the date the new requirement starts. Directors that fail to apply for a DIN within the applicable timeframe will be liable for civil and criminal penalties.

 

In addition to the penalties for failing to apply for a DIN, there are also civil and criminal penalties which apply to conduct that undermines the requirement. For example, criminal penalties apply for deliberately providing false identity information to the registrar, intentionally providing a false DIN to a government body or relevant body corporate, or internationally applying for multiple DINs.

 

The proposal initially applies only to appointed directors and acting alternate directors, it does not extend to de facto or shadow directors. However, the definition of “eligible officer” may be extended by regulation to any other officers of a registered body as appropriate. This will provide the flexibility to ensure the DIN’s effectiveness going forward. Just as the definition of eligible officer may be extended, the registrar also has the power to exempt an individual from being an eligible officer to avoid unintended consequences.

 

Recently, there have been cases in the media where individuals have unknowingly or unwittingly become directors of sham companies for various nefarious purposes. The DIN proposal inserts a defence for directors appointed without their knowledge, due to either identify theft or forgery. However, it notes that the defendant will carry the evidential burden to adduce or point to evidence that suggests a reasonable possibility that the defence exists, and once that’s done the prosecution bears the burden of proof. The government notes that the evidential burden has been reversed because it is significantly more costly for the prosecution to disprove than for the defence to establish.

 

Where to now?

Apart from ensuring that your identity is safe, we can help if you think you may inadvertently be a director of a company and no longer wish to be. Otherwise, if you’re the director and want to understand more about this potential change including the timeline, contact us today.

Will I Qualify For The Age Pension?

 

As we start to think about retirement, one of the first questions many of us ask is “Will I qualify for the Age Pension?” To help you understand your eligibility, we outline the basic thresholds that apply under the different means tests and what types of assets and income sources are included.

 

Knowing whether you’ll be entitled to the Age Pension is an important part of your retirement planning. Once you reach Age Pension age (66 years from 1 July 2019), you’ll also need to pass two tests: the assets test and income test. If your eligibility works out differently under the two tests, the less favourable result applies.

 

Assets test

If you own your own home, to qualify for the full pension your “assets” must not be worth more than $258,500 (for singles) or $387,500 (for couples). For non-homeowners, these limits are $465,500 and $594,500.Above these thresholds, you may qualify for a reduced pension. However, your entitlement to the pension ceases if your assets are worth more than $567,250 (for single homeowners) or $853,000 (for couples). For non-homeowners, these limits are $774,250 and $1,060,000.

 

So, what “assets” are included? All property holdings other than your principal home count, less any debt secured against the property.

 

There are also special rules for granny flat interests and retirement home contributions, so get advice before moving into these accommodation options.

Investments like shares, loans and term deposits or cash accounts all count, as do your share in any net assets of a business you run and part of the market value of assets in any private trusts or companies you’re considered to “control”.

And once you reach Age Pension age, your superannuation is also included. This includes your accumulation account and most income stream accounts.

 

How you structure your investments could make a big difference. Consider the following tips:

-Selling the family home can significantly impact your assets test position. For example, if you sell and put the proceeds into superannuation, that wealth will become subject to the assets test.

-Paying more off your home mortgage may improve your assets test position. For example, if you meet a condition of release you might consider withdrawing some superannuation benefits and using these to pay down your mortgage.

-Be careful when “gifting” away assets, including selling assets to your children below market value. The value of gifts in excess of $10,000 in a financial year, or $30,000 across five financial years, will count towards the test.

 

In any case, before changing your asset structure you should ask: does it make financial sense to rely on the Age Pension? You may be better off building investments that will generate a higher income for you in retirement.

 

Income test

If you earn up to $172 per fortnight as a single (or $304 as a couple), you can potentially receive the full pension. Above this, your pension entitlement will taper down before ceasing at income of $2,024.40 per fortnight for singles and $3,096.40 for couples. A “Work Bonus” allows pensioners to earn up to $250 from employment per fortnight without it affecting their pension.

 

The income test is broad and includes any gross amounts you earn from anywhere in the world. As well as your income from employment (above the Work Bonus) or business activities, the test also includes things like investment income (eg dividends, trust distributions and rental income), superannuation income streams and even a share of the income in any private trusts or companies you “control”.

 

Your income from certain financial assets is “deemed” at a certain rate. If your actual earnings from these investments exceed the deeming rate, the excess doesn’t count towards the income test. The deeming rules apply to assets like listed shares and managed investments, savings accounts and term deposits, and many superannuation accounts.

 

Plan for a secure retirement 

Contact us to start your retirement planning today. We’ll advise you on the most beneficial way to approach your income from superannuation, the Age Pension and other investments to help you achieve the best retirement outcome.

Government Tenders And Tax Compliance

Bidding on Commonwealth government tenders could soon be more complex, with the government seeking to exclude businesses that do not have a satisfactory tax record from the tender process. It would apply from 1 July 2019 to all tenders with an estimated value of over $4m (including GST) and includes construction services. Businesses that wish to tender must generally be up-to-date with their tax obligations including both registration and lodgement requirements and not have any outstanding debt.

 

Do you run a business that would like to bid on lucrative Commonwealth government contracts or is likely to do so in the future? From 1 July 2019, the government is seeking to exclude from the tender process those businesses that do not have a “satisfactory tax record (STR)” as a part of its measures to tackle the black economy. The initiative would apply to all tenders with an estimated value of over $4m (including GST) for all goods and/or services including for construction services.

 

Those companies wishing to tender must either provide a satisfactory STR that is valid for at least 2 months or more at the time of the tender closing, or in circumstances where a satisfactory STR has not been issued, provide an STR receipt demonstrating that an STR has been requested from the ATO and then provide the STR no later than 4 business days from the close of tender and before the awarding of the contract.

 

To obtain a satisfactory STR from the ATO, the business must:

-be up-to-date with registration requirements (ie ABN, GST, TFN etc);
-have lodged at least 90% of all income tax returns, FBT returns and BASs that were due in the last 4 years or the period of operation if less than 4 years;
-not have $10,000 or greater in outstanding debt due to the ATO on the date the STR is issued. Note this does not include debt subject to a taxation objection, review or appeal or debt that is a part of a payment plan with the ATO.

 

When an STR is issued, it will usually be valid for 12 months from the time of issue. However, those businesses that do not hold an Australian tax record with the ATO of at least 4 years will generally receive STRs that are only valid for 6 months.

 

There may also be additional requirements in relation to obtaining STRs for subcontractors, foreign companies, partnerships, trusts, joint ventures and tax consolidated groups tendering for Commonwealth government contracts from 1 July 2019.

 

Depending on how well the policy runs in its first year, the government is open to introducing further criteria to determine an STR, such as whether the business:

-meets its superannuation law requirements and PAYG withholding obligations;
-discloses information about its tax affairs under the voluntary tax transparency code;
-has had court order penalties imposed on its directors; and
-its related parties have had convictions for phoenixing behaviour, bribery or corruption.

 

Note this initiative is not designed to replace existing due diligence and checks that are already undertaken, including those relating to business practices that are dishonest, unethical or unsafe, not entering into contracts with businesses that have had a judicial decision against them relating to employee entitlements and who have not satisfied any resulting order (not including decisions under appeal).

 

Want to get your tax obligations in order?

Get on the front foot with your business by getting all your tax obligations in order. Contact us today for all your income tax, FBT and GST needs, we have the expertise to help you with any tax issue, no matter how complex. If you’re planning to expand your business, we can help you map out a plan for a smooth evolution.

NEWS LETTER SIGNUP

ADDRESS

Copyright @ 2022 DSV Partners. Developed By | Swift Computers